|
|
Medi-Cal
| FQHC/RHC
Payment Reductions |
The Administration proposes to eliminate $72.68
million in payments to Federally Qualified Health Centers
(FQHCs) and Rural Health Clinics (RHCs). |
| |
|
The Administration proposes to significantly
restructure the Medi-Cal program by adding copays and
premiums and creating tiered benefit packages for some
populations currently eligible for full scope Medi-Cal.
|
| |
|
The Administration proposes to cap Medi-Cal
enrollment for legal permanent residents and undocumented
immigrants at the January 1, 2004 estimated level of caseload.
|
| |
|
The Administration proposes to reduce
provider rates for Medi-Cal providers by 10 percent, despite
a successful legal challenge
enjoining last year’s 5 percent provider rate cut. |
| |
|
Proposals involving managed care expansions,
moratorium on Adult Day Health Care, etc. |
| FQHC/RHC
Payment Reductions |
In his January Budget, Governor Schwarzenegger proposed
a $72.68 million reduction in core Medi-Cal reimbursement
to California’s community health centers. This proposed
reduction to federally qualified health centers (FQHCs)
and rural health clinics (RHCs) amounts to up to a 20% cut
in reimbursement to these vital safety net providers.
FQHCs and RHCs are essential providers to California’s
rural and urban communities. These facilities are located
in the State’s most medically underserved areas, serving
communities that would otherwise lack access to primary
care services. By providing cost effective primary and preventative
services, these health centers save the health care system
money by reducing visits to more costly treatment settings,
like emergency rooms. FQHCs and RHCs are the backbone of
the State’s health care safety net.
Unfortunately, these health centers are not financially
diversified. Due to their non-profit status and the populations
that they serve, these health centers rely on Medi-Cal payments
to provide their services. Sixty-eight percent of all reimbursement
for patient services is derived from Medi-Cal, with 40%
of total health center revenue coming from Medi-Cal. Reducing
this funding source would financially destabilize these
providers.
This reduction in FQHC/RHC reimbursement threatens the
success of President Bush’s national community health
center initiative in California. The President’s historic
initiative to double the capacity of the nation’s
FQHCs would expand access to affordable primary care for
the nation’s underserved. Unfortunately, the FQHCs
facing a cut to their reimbursement are the very ones being
promoted by the President’s Initiative. Without stable
Medi-Cal funding, the success of the President’s historic
initiative is threatened. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Medi-Cal
Waiver Proposal |
The Governor has proposed obtaining a Medicaid 1115 demonstration
waiver to restructure and reform Medi-Cal, a program that
provides health coverage to 6 million Californians. As part
of this waiver, the Administration is envisioning implementing
premiums & co-payments for beneficiaries and a tiered
benefit package based on mandatory and optional populations.
The Administration estimates that implementation of the
waiver will result in General Fund savings of $400 million
in next year’s budget.
The Administration will seek a Section 1115 Waiver to implement
the Medi-Cal restructuring. Although 1115 Waivers require
coverage expansions, the savings anticipated by the Administration
shows its intent to reduce services as a primary focus of
the waiver initiative. 1115 Waivers have resulted in service
reductions in other states.
While other states waivers do include small expansion populations,
few are likely to benefit from the expansion of coverage.
For example, Utah’s expansion program requires beneficiaries
to pay a $50 annual enrollment fee, which is charged to
even the lowest-income enrollees. Data from this new expansion
program already shows the enrollment fee to be a significant
barrier to access. In Oregon, providers are allowed to refuse
service to a beneficiary who cannot afford the co-payment
at the time of services. |
| |
| |
| |
|
| |
| Cap
on Immigrant Enrollment in Non-Emergency Medi-Cal |
The proposal to cap Medi-Cal enrollment for
immigrants will place almost 78,000 low-income immigrants
on a waiting list for health care coverage in the first
year. These immigrants are society’s most vulnerable
populations in need of health care, including pregnant women,
infants, elderly, and those diagnosed with breast or cervical
cancer. Even without the proposed cap, immigrant children
are already three times more likely to be uninsured than
children in U.S.-born families, according to the California
Policy Research Center.
The elimination of health care coverage for immigrant populations
will also have a negative impact on safety net providers,
including CCHCs. In 2002, CCHCs provided over 3 million
patient visits to Medi-Cal recipients, representing approximately
33% of the patient encounters. However, because CCHCs see
such a large percentage of uninsured patients, Medi-Cal
accounts for a much greater share of clinic revenues, approximately
43%.[1]
[1]The cap on enrollment will result in greater numbers
of uninsured immigrants, and a loss of important revenue
for CCHCs. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| An
Additional 10 Percent Medi-Cal Provider Rate Reduction |
California’s Medi-Cal rates are already
the lowest in the nation. According to the leading physician
organization in the state, as many as 40% of private practice
Medi-Cal providers could be lost if rates are lowered still
further.
Furthermore, a provider rate reduction will also limit
the number of health care specialists that accept Medi-Cal
patients. Medi-Cal beneficiaries already have a specialist
network which is less than half the size of the general
population. The proposed reduction will result in limiting
or possibly eliminating the ability of CCHCs to refer Medi-Cal
patients for medically-necessary specialty care services.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Other Medi-Cal
Proposed Reductions |
| |
• One-Year Moratorium
on New Adult Day Health Centers:
The Administration proposes a one-year moratorium on new
adult day health care centers (ADHC) and on the expansion
of existing ADHCs. In addition, the Administration proposes
that ADHCs have therapy and transportation services removed
from bundled reimbursement, and instead can seek reimbursement
for these services separately.
• Medi-Cal Managed Care County Expansion
The Administration plans to expand Medi-Cal managed care
beyond the 22 counties where it is currently offered. The
current make–up of Medi-Cal managed care includes: 11 health
plans in the Two Plan Model that participate in 11 counties:
Alameda, Contra Costa, Fresno, Kern, Los Angeles, Riverside,
San Francisco, San Joaquin, Santa Clara, Stanislaus, and
Tulare. The Two Plan Model covers approximately 2.4 million
enrollees. [1]
5 health systems with 539,000 Medi-Cal beneficiaries
participate in the County Organized Health System in the
8 counties: Orange, Monterey, Santa Cruz, Napa, Solano,
Yolo, San Mateo, and Santa Barbara[2]
. 9 health plans covering approximately 339,179 Medi-Cal
beneficiaries operate in two counties (Sacramento and San
Diego) that participate in the Geographic Managed Care Model.
[3] For
people with disabilities living in one of the eight counties
participating in County Organized Health System, enrollment
in managed care is required.
The Administration is recommending that the state consider
the expansion of these models in some of the remaining 36
counties.
• Aged Blind and Disabled in Managed
Care
The Governor proposes desire to encourage disabled Medi-Cal
beneficiaries to enroll into Medi-Cal managed care plans.
The proposal is an attempt to control cost because disabled
Medi-Cal beneficiaries make up approximately 17 percent
of the Medi-Cal population but account for 44 percent of
Medi-Cal expenditures.[4]
Currently 21 percent of the Medi-Cal beneficiaries with
a disability are enrolled in a managed care plan, while
64 percent of non-disabled beneficiaries have chosen managed
care.[5] |
| |
[1]
California Healthcare Foundation, Legislative Luncheon,
December 18 th , 2003
[2]
Ibid
[3]
Ibid
[4]
Medi-Cal Policy Institute, Adult with Disabilities
in Medi-cal: Utilization and Expenditure Trends 1995-2001.
June 2003
[5]
Ibid
|
|
|
Copyright ©2005 California Primary Care Association. Contact information and legal disclaimers.
|